Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-02-25 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2013-02-25 House Journal Page 0369 HB 52 The following, which was held from the February 20, 2013, calendar (page 332), was before the House in third reading: HOUSE BILL NO. 52 am "An Act relating to allowable absences from the state for purposes of eligibility for permanent fund dividends; and providing for an effective date." Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 52 am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 3. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Gara: Page 4, following line 10: Insert a new subsection to read: "(g) After an otherwise eligible individual has been absent from the state as allowed under AS 43.23.008(a)(1)-(16) for more than 180 days in each of the 10 preceding qualifying years, the department shall hold the dividend in trust for the individual. The department shall pay the amount held in trust to the individual when the individual has been present in the state for at least 250 days in a qualifying year." Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Feige objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2013-02-25 House Journal Page 0370 HB 52 am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Neuman And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. HB 52 am was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall HB 52 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 52 am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Tarr, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Drummond, Gara, Keller, Seaton, Stoltze, Tuck Excused: Guttenberg, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Neuman And so, HB 52 am passed the House. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2013-02-25 House Journal Page 0371 HB 52 am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.